On coming to the end of the course and now reaching the pre-assessment period I thought it would be a good idea to summarise what I had learnt from each part of the course Assignments, 1) to embed the learning for future courses and projects and 2) to use as a review and reflection tool which gives ease of reference to the learning points.
So to summarise the feedback received:
- being closer to a subject is not necessarily a weaker position,
- consider a variety of viewpoints,
- consider what you want the viewer to focus on and depth of field,
- take care with the placing of white objects especially near the frame,
- textures are interesting detail so their inclusion should be considered,
- look for strong patterns when creating images,
- don’t be afraid to experiment with ISO,
- take care with positioning and check for unwanted items near key subjects, and
- use the exercises to inform assignments.
Image 6 – “Hello Tree” was recommended a re-shoot to capture the textures on the tree, this is below for your reference:
I decided to take a slightly different viewpoint of this tree for a number of reasons;
- there were (and are increasing) so many cars parked down this road I didn’t want to include the number plates of the cars behind the tree, which a wider angle would have resulted in,
- there was a huge white van directly to my right which restricted the positioning of the camera and if included would have become the main focal point and draw to the eye being white if I had included it, and
- by being closer to the tree it meant I could get more detail out of the trunk. I used a slightly higher f-stop than previously which meant I have included most of the tree in the depth of field used. Previously I had focused more on the ground in front of the tree so this I feel is an improvement.
The leading lines are primarly on the path side of the tree this time, which I think works better as part of a ‘journey’ compostionally. Also the light quality is different to the original due to the different time of day/year the images were taken. This reinforces the fact that to try to recreate an image exactly, where the environment is not controlled, is impossible. The re-shot image was taken on a rainy day as was the original but even the puddles were not the same….
To enable a comparison to be made of the images I have added them both below side by side for your ease of reference (both were taken at 17mm with ISO 100:
For the purposes of my Assessment submission I have provided an A4 print of the re-shot image 6. This now completes my work, re-work and reflection of part one/Assignment one.